analiza aiqbench
This research proposes embedding Vision-Language Models as active coordination agents within the human-UAV loop to streamline disaster triage and reduce operator cognitive load. By integrating Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) with Incident Command System protocols, the framework enables VLMs to manage mission-level task allocation rather than merely offering advisory support. Preliminary evaluations indicate significant reductions in mental demand and frustration while maintaining high levels of trust in autonomous decision-making during critical response scenarios.
A Systems Engineering Framework for Vision-Language-Enabled UAV Triage and Disaster Response
arXiv:2607.27597v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in Vision Language Models (VLMs) have created new opportunities for disaster response, where responders must interpret large volumes of sensor data under time pressure. Current VLM applications include social media monitoring for situational awareness, generation of draft action plans, and translation of technical alerts into public-facing messages. While these efforts can accelerate information flow, they remain largely limited to decision-support roles. Such approaches can increase operator burden because humans must still translate outputs into coordinated actions across teams and robotic assets. This study explores the viability of embedding VLMs as coordination agents within the human-UAV loop. The proposed architecture integrates natural language interaction, mission-level task coordination, software-in-the-loop implementation, and communication aligned with the Incident Command System (ICS). Rather than functioning solely as advisory tools, VLMs facilitate communication between human operators, mission control logic, and UAV task execution. The framework was developed using a Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) approach, with use case and block definition diagrams representing system roles, internal structure, and component interactions. Three key elements, the VLM Coordinator Agent, UAV Mission Control, and Task Allocator, were implemented within an integrated simulation and control environment. A preliminary human-factors evaluation with seven participants showed reduced perceived workload across mental demand, effort, and frustration, along with high ratings for AI trust and communication clarity. By integrating MBSE, software-in-the-loop testing, and human-factors evaluation, this work advances scalable human-autonomy teaming for high-stakes disaster response, with broader implications for aerospace autonomy and civil safety.
Abstract:Recent advances in Vision Language Models (VLMs) have created new opportunities for disaster response, where responders must interpret large volumes of sensor data under time pressure. Current VLM applications include social media monitoring for situational awareness, generation of draft action plans, and translation of technical alerts into public-facing messages. While these efforts can accelerate information flow, they remain largely limited to decision-support roles. Such approaches can increase operator burden because humans must still translate outputs into coordinated actions across teams and robotic assets. This study explores the viability of embedding VLMs as coordination agents within the human-UAV loop. The proposed architecture integrates natural language interaction, mission-level task coordination, software-in-the-loop implementation, and communication aligned with the Incident Command System (ICS). Rather than functioning solely as advisory tools, VLMs facilitate communication between human operators, mission control logic, and UAV task execution. The framework was developed using a Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) approach, with use case and block definition diagrams representing system roles, internal structure, and component interactions. Three key elements, the VLM Coordinator Agent, UAV Mission Control, and Task Allocator, were implemented within an integrated simulation and control environment. A preliminary human-factors evaluation with seven participants showed reduced perceived workload across mental demand, effort, and frustration, along with high ratings for AI trust and communication clarity. By integrating MBSE, software-in-the-loop testing, and human-factors evaluation, this work advances scalable human-autonomy teaming for high-stakes disaster response, with broader implications for aerospace autonomy and civil safety.
10 pages, 8 figures. Author accepted manuscript of AIAA Paper 2026-4010, published in the AIAA AVIATION 2026 Forum
Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
arXiv:2607.27597 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2607.27597v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.27597 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2026-4010 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 369 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · 27 aug. 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · 24 sept. 2026

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · 21 mai 2026

Amazon Research Awards recipients announced
Amazon Science · 27 mai 2026