analiza aiqbench
This systematic review highlights the critical fragmentation in Natural Language Processing for Ghanaian languages, revealing a stark resource imbalance where development is heavily skewed toward Twi while over 70 other indigenous languages remain largely unaddressed. The study offers a prioritized roadmap to tackle challenges such as dialectal variation and non-standardized orthographies, providing a replicable template for advancing low-resource language settings globally.
A Systematic Review of NLP for Ghanaian Languages: Datasets, Models, and a Research Roadmap
arXiv:2405.06818v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Natural Language Processing (NLP) for Ghana's 73 living indigenous languages remains deeply fragmented, under-resourced, and heavily skewed toward a single language. We present the first systematic review of the Ghanaian NLP landscape, screening 17,000+ publications across four academic databases to critically synthesize 36 core studies spanning datasets, model architectures, and evaluation paradigms. Our analysis exposes a severe resource imbalance: Twi-centric NLP has grown modestly, driven largely by religious-text alignment and crowdsourcing, while the remaining 70+ languages remain almost entirely unaddressed, and dataset releases, model checkpoints, and evaluation practices remain inconsistent and rarely shared across the field. We translate these findings into a prioritized roadmap targeting Ghana's acute regional constraints, dialectal variation, non-standardized orthographies, and the absence of shared infrastructure, offering a replicable template for systematic review and research prioritization in other low-resource language settings.
Abstract:Natural Language Processing (NLP) for Ghana's 73 living indigenous languages remains deeply fragmented, under-resourced, and heavily skewed toward a single language. We present the first systematic review of the Ghanaian NLP landscape, screening 17,000+ publications across four academic databases to critically synthesize 36 core studies spanning datasets, model architectures, and evaluation paradigms. Our analysis exposes a severe resource imbalance: Twi-centric NLP has grown modestly, driven largely by religious-text alignment and crowdsourcing, while the remaining 70+ languages remain almost entirely unaddressed, and dataset releases, model checkpoints, and evaluation practices remain inconsistent and rarely shared across the field. We translate these findings into a prioritized roadmap targeting Ghana's acute regional constraints, dialectal variation, non-standardized orthographies, and the absence of shared infrastructure, offering a replicable template for systematic review and research prioritization in other low-resource language settings.
8 main pages. Includes an appendix with supplementary methodology and abstract translations in 15 languages
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2405.06818 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2405.06818v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.06818 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 242 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Large Language Model for Verilog Code Generation: Literature Review and the Road Ahead
arXiv · 21 aug. 2026

Article: Governing AI in the Cloud: A Practical Guide for Architects
InfoQ · 15 iun. 2026

Reviewing failure modes in science as we prepare for AI researchers
LessWrong · 8 oct. 2026

Amazon Research Awards recipients announced
Amazon Science · 27 mai 2026