analiza aiqbench
This systematic review demonstrates that hybrid architectures combining deep learning with modal decomposition techniques like VMD and EEMD significantly improve interval forecasting accuracy for wind energy integration. By employing a dual-model strategy to independently predict uncertainty bounds, these approaches narrow prediction intervals while maintaining reliable coverage rates. However, the study identifies critical gaps in standardized evaluation metrics and real-world validation that must be addressed to advance model robustness in operational settings.
A Systematic Evaluation of Current Architectures in Wind Power Forecasting
arXiv:2606.02849v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Interval wind speed forecasting is essential for the efficient integration of wind energy into power systems, as it accounts for the inherent uncertainty of wind resources. This study presents a systematic literature review focused on hybrid approaches to interval forecasting of wind generation, exploring the combination of deep learning, modal decomposition, and statistical methods. To guide the paper selection, Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) was applied for topic modeling, enabling the identification of patterns and research trends. The findings emphasize that integrating hybrid models with decomposition techniques-such as Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD) and Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD)-enhances forecast accuracy and reliability by narrowing prediction intervals without compromising coverage. Regarding interval construction, most studies adopt a dual-model strategy, independently forecasting the lower and upper bounds. Input data are commonly decomposed using techniques like EMD, EEMD, or VMD, which extract frequency-based components. These components serve as inputs to models such as LSTM or ELM, trained separately for each bound. This approach allows for targeted modeling of uncertainty, improving flexibility and precision, Interval quality is typically evaluated through metrics that balance coverage and interval width. The review also highlights challenges, including the lack of standardized evaluation metrics, computational complexity, and limited real-world validation. Overall, the study reinforces the value of interval forecasting for wind energy operations and offers insights for advancing model robustness and decision-making.
Abstract:Interval wind speed forecasting is essential for the efficient integration of wind energy into power systems, as it accounts for the inherent uncertainty of wind resources. This study presents a systematic literature review focused on hybrid approaches to interval forecasting of wind generation, exploring the combination of deep learning, modal decomposition, and statistical methods. To guide the paper selection, Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) was applied for topic modeling, enabling the identification of patterns and research trends. The findings emphasize that integrating hybrid models with decomposition techniques-such as Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD) and Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD)-enhances forecast accuracy and reliability by narrowing prediction intervals without compromising coverage. Regarding interval construction, most studies adopt a dual-model strategy, independently forecasting the lower and upper bounds. Input data are commonly decomposed using techniques like EMD, EEMD, or VMD, which extract frequency-based components. These components serve as inputs to models such as LSTM or ELM, trained separately for each bound. This approach allows for targeted modeling of uncertainty, improving flexibility and precision, Interval quality is typically evaluated through metrics that balance coverage and interval width. The review also highlights challenges, including the lack of standardized evaluation metrics, computational complexity, and limited real-world validation. Overall, the study reinforces the value of interval forecasting for wind energy operations and offers insights for advancing model robustness and decision-making.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.02849 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2606.02849v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.02849 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3628172 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 326 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
ORBIT-2 based Weather and Climate Downscaling and Downscaled Global Forecasts on AMD Instinct
AMD · 8 iun. 2026

Researchers Find No Quantum Advantage in Time-Series Forecasting Models
Quantum Zeitgeist · 29 iul. 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026
The current bottleneck is political will, not research
AI Alignment Forum · 11 iul. 2026