Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchAI & societate

analiza aiqbench

This study investigates how combining explicit and implicit communication modalities affects human-artificial agent interactions, finding that while task performance metrics like error rates remain largely stable, mixed communication significantly boosts user perceptions of the agent's acceptance, sociability, and transparency. The research highlights a divergence between objective efficiency measures and subjective social evaluations, suggesting that non-verbal cues are critical for building trust in both virtual agents and humanoid robots regardless of task difficulty.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

A study on the effects of mixed explicit and implicit communications in human-artificial-agent interactions

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2409.18745v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Communication between humans and artificial agents is essential for their interaction. This is often inspired by human communication, which uses gestures, facial expressions, gaze direction, and other explicit and implicit means. This work presents interaction experiments where humans and artificial agents interact through explicit and implicit communication to evaluate the effect of mixed explicit-implicit communication against purely explicit communication and the impact of the task difficulty in this evaluation. Results obtained using Bayesian parameter estimation show that the task execution time did not significantly change when mixed explicit and implicit communications were used in neither of our experiments, which varied in the type of artificial agent (virtual agent and humanoid robot) used and task difficulty. The number of errors was affected by the communication only when the human was executing a more difficult task, and an impact on the perceived efficiency of the interaction was only observed in the interaction with the robot, for both easy and difficult tasks. In contrast, acceptance, sociability, and transparency of the artificial agent increased when using mixed communication modalities in both our experiments and task difficulty levels. This suggests that task-related measures, such as time, number of errors, and perceived efficiency of the interaction, as well as the impact of the communication on them, are more sensitive to the type of task and the difficulty level, whereas the combination of explicit and implicit communications more consistently improves human perceptions about artificial agents.

Abstract:Communication between humans and artificial agents is essential for their interaction. This is often inspired by human communication, which uses gestures, facial expressions, gaze direction, and other explicit and implicit means. This work presents interaction experiments where humans and artificial agents interact through explicit and implicit communication to evaluate the effect of mixed explicit-implicit communication against purely explicit communication and the impact of the task difficulty in this evaluation. Results obtained using Bayesian parameter estimation show that the task execution time did not significantly change when mixed explicit and implicit communications were used in neither of our experiments, which varied in the type of artificial agent (virtual agent and humanoid robot) used and task difficulty. The number of errors was affected by the communication only when the human was executing a more difficult task, and an impact on the perceived efficiency of the interaction was only observed in the interaction with the robot, for both easy and difficult tasks. In contrast, acceptance, sociability, and transparency of the artificial agent increased when using mixed communication modalities in both our experiments and task difficulty levels. This suggests that task-related measures, such as time, number of errors, and perceived efficiency of the interaction, as well as the impact of the communication on them, are more sensitive to the type of task and the difficulty level, whereas the combination of explicit and implicit communications more consistently improves human perceptions about artificial agents.

Main paper with 33 pages, 16 figures, 5 tables. Supplementary material with 39 pages, 44 figures, 2 tables. Submitted to Intelligent Service Robotics

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2409.18745 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2409.18745v5 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.18745 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 352 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe