analiza aiqbench
This research exposes a critical flaw in standard speech separation benchmarks where noisy reference signals artificially cap the achievable SI-SDR and degrade output quality. While proposed reference enhancement methods reduce noise, they risk introducing artifacts that limit overall perceptual gains, suggesting a negative correlation between the metric and actual noisiness. Practitioners should prioritize non-intrusive metrics like NISQA.v2 over SI-SDR when evaluating models trained on imperfect reference data.
A Study of the Scale Invariant Signal to Distortion Ratio in Speech Separation with Noisy References
arXiv:2508.14623v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper examines the implications of using the Scale-Invariant Signal-to-Distortion Ratio (SI-SDR) as both evaluation and training objective in supervised speech separation, when the training references contain noise, as is the case with the de facto benchmark WSJ0-2Mix. A derivation of the SI-SDR with noisy references reveals that noise limits the achievable SI-SDR, or leads to undesired noise in the separated outputs. To address this, a method is proposed to enhance references and augment the mixtures with WHAM!, aiming to train models that avoid learning noisy references. Two models trained on these enhanced datasets are evaluated with the non-intrusive NISQA.v2 metric. Results show reduced noise in separated speech but suggest that processing references may introduce artefacts, limiting overall quality gains. Negative correlation is found between SI-SDR and perceived noisiness across models on the WSJ0-2Mix and Libri2Mix test sets, underlining the conclusion from the derivation.
Abstract:This paper examines the implications of using the Scale-Invariant Signal-to-Distortion Ratio (SI-SDR) as both evaluation and training objective in supervised speech separation, when the training references contain noise, as is the case with the de facto benchmark WSJ0-2Mix. A derivation of the SI-SDR with noisy references reveals that noise limits the achievable SI-SDR, or leads to undesired noise in the separated outputs. To address this, a method is proposed to enhance references and augment the mixtures with WHAM!, aiming to train models that avoid learning noisy references. Two models trained on these enhanced datasets are evaluated with the non-intrusive NISQA.v2 metric. Results show reduced noise in separated speech but suggest that processing references may introduce artefacts, limiting overall quality gains. Negative correlation is found between SI-SDR and perceived noisiness across models on the WSJ0-2Mix and Libri2Mix test sets, underlining the conclusion from the derivation.
Accepted for IEEE ASRU 2025, Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding. Copyright (c) 2025 IEEE. 8 pages, 6 figures, 2 tables
Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Sound (cs.SD)
arXiv:2508.14623 [eess.AS]
(or arXiv:2508.14623v2 [eess.AS] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.14623 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
2025 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU), Honolulu, HI, USA, 2025, pp. 1-8
https://doi.org/10.1109/ASRU65441.2025.11434756 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 290 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Lend me an Ear: Speech Enhancement Using a Robotic Arm with a Microphone Array
arXiv · 24 sept. 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026
DI Series: Serving Kimi-K3 MXFP4 Wide-EP Disaggregated on AMD Instinct MI300X and MI325X
AMD · 8 oct. 2026

How Photonic Chips Differ From Electronic Chips
Quantum Zeitgeist · 19 sept. 2026