analiza aiqbench
This study applies machine learning frameworks like random forests to quantify offensive impact in professional box lacrosse, specifically estimating expected goals (xG) and attributing shot quality. While the methodology is rigorous, the findings are limited to a single team over 13 games, positioning the work as an exploratory case study rather than a generalizable league-wide model. The research demonstrates how ML techniques can extract deeper insights from sports data but highlights current limitations in causal inference for specific tactical elements like pick plays.
A Statistical and Machine Learning Framework for Quantifying Offensive Impact in Professional Box Lacrosse
arXiv:2609.06610v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Professional box-lacrosse statistics summarize outcomes but provide limited information about shot quality or the roles behind scoring opportunities. This study develops a documented framework for estimating expected goals (xG) and attributing recorded offensive involvement using 1,006 manually annotated Rochester Knighthawks shot attempts, including 151 goals, from 13 consecutive 2025-2026 National Lacrosse League games. Logistic regression, random forest, and extremely randomized trees were evaluated across three nested feature sets using Leave-One-Game-Out cross-validation and a training-fold base-rate benchmark. The contextual baseline random forest had the lowest observed pooled log loss (0.4189) and Brier score (0.1260), improving on the benchmark by 1.22% and 1.50%; five of nine specifications did not beat the benchmark. Adding two-man-action and pick-type fields did not improve the primary metrics. Core Offensive Impact attributes recorded involvement through shooter xG and shot-based expected assists for final passers. Expected Pick Value (xPV) compares a qualifying pick's observed-state probability with a no-pick counterfactual. Its magnitude was indistinguishable from model noise. Its directional pattern exceeded 200 row-permutation replicates, but limited tail resolution and failure to preserve game-level pick composition make the diagnostic descriptive rather than inferential. Accordingly, xPV is reported only as an exploratory augmented component. Given the single-team, 13-game sample, the results are an initial case study rather than league-wide or causal estimates.
Abstract:Professional box-lacrosse statistics summarize outcomes but provide limited information about shot quality or the roles behind scoring opportunities. This study develops a documented framework for estimating expected goals (xG) and attributing recorded offensive involvement using 1,006 manually annotated Rochester Knighthawks shot attempts, including 151 goals, from 13 consecutive 2025-2026 National Lacrosse League games. Logistic regression, random forest, and extremely randomized trees were evaluated across three nested feature sets using Leave-One-Game-Out cross-validation and a training-fold base-rate benchmark. The contextual baseline random forest had the lowest observed pooled log loss (0.4189) and Brier score (0.1260), improving on the benchmark by 1.22% and 1.50%; five of nine specifications did not beat the benchmark. Adding two-man-action and pick-type fields did not improve the primary metrics. Core Offensive Impact attributes recorded involvement through shooter xG and shot-based expected assists for final passers. Expected Pick Value (xPV) compares a qualifying pick's observed-state probability with a no-pick counterfactual. Its magnitude was indistinguishable from model noise. Its directional pattern exceeded 200 row-permutation replicates, but limited tail resolution and failure to preserve game-level pick composition make the diagnostic descriptive rather than inferential. Accordingly, xPV is reported only as an exploratory augmented component. Given the single-team, 13-game sample, the results are an initial case study rather than league-wide or causal estimates.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.06610 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.06610v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.06610 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 305 cuvinte
