analiza aiqbench
This paper unifies frameworks for goal selection and internal belief states within hierarchical reinforcement learning using hidden Markov models, addressing limitations in prior work regarding environmental observability and external goal imposition. By integrating these approaches, the research advances the theoretical foundations of agent autonomy and complex planning architectures central to next-generation AI systems.
A note on goal-based hierarchical RL
arXiv:2609.14605v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The agent-centric general value function (ACGVF) construction of \citet{tasse2026goal} lets the agent make two decisions that are normally imposed by the environment or agent designer: which goal to pursue and when to declare a goal as finished (in addition to choosing the action). This is a very general framework that subsumes almost all prior work on reinforcement learning, control and planning, as well as more general formalisms proposed in the cognitive sciences. However, it assumes the environment is fully observed, i.e., that the observation is a sufficient statistic. In \citet{murphy2025rl}, a general agent design was proposed where the policy is based on an internal belief state $z_t$ and an internal goal; however, the goals were assumed to be externally provided. In this note, we unify and extend these two approaches using the formalism of hierarchical hidden Markov models (HHMM) \citep{murphy2001hhmm}.
Abstract:The agent-centric general value function (ACGVF) construction of \citet{tasse2026goal} lets the agent make two decisions that are normally imposed by the environment or agent designer: which goal to pursue and when to declare a goal as finished (in addition to choosing the action). This is a very general framework that subsumes almost all prior work on reinforcement learning, control and planning, as well as more general formalisms proposed in the cognitive sciences. However, it assumes the environment is fully observed, i.e., that the observation is a sufficient statistic. In \citet{murphy2025rl}, a general agent design was proposed where the policy is based on an internal belief state $z_t$ and an internal goal; however, the goals were assumed to be externally provided. In this note, we unify and extend these two approaches using the formalism of hierarchical hidden Markov models (HHMM) \citep{murphy2001hhmm}.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.14605 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.14605v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.14605 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 234 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Towards embedded evaluations for scheming propensities
LessWrong · 8 oct. 2026

An overview of frontier AI company monitoring practices in mid 2026
LessWrong · 7 oct. 2026

Exploding variance of means of exponentials: least-squares to the rescue – Machine Learning Research Blog
francisbach.com · 27 sept. 2026
Coverage-driven alignment - What ‘Teaching Claude Why’ can borrow from AV verification
LessWrong · 8 iun. 2026