analiza aiqbench
This research introduces GEODE, a foundation model designed to handle heterogeneous scientific interfaces for energy and radiation systems without forcing data into uniform grid or tokenized representations. By coupling task-specific operators with a shared library of wavelet functions, the study demonstrates that preserving pretrained computation is distinct from simple parameter isolation, which otherwise degrades earlier predictions by significant factors. The findings highlight critical distinctions between multi-task coverage, preservation, and actual pretrained reuse when models span diverse physical domains.
A foundation model for energy and radiation systems built on heterogeneous scientific interfaces
arXiv:2609.38067v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific foundation models are commonly evaluated after heterogeneous physical problems have already been translated into a compatible gridded, tokenized or symbolic representation. This leaves the scientific interface outside both the pretrained model and the audit of what is actually reused. We study the complementary setting in which boundary histories, sparse monitor records and loading histories retain their native inference classes and their outputs remain on Cartesian, latitude-longitude and unstructured domains. GEODE couples task-specific scientific interfaces to a shared routed library of wavelet operators. A single jointly pretrained model represents cavity flow, radiation dose and elastoplastic stress, then acquires a heat exchanger and a reactor subchannel by training a private interface containing 2.1% of its parameters. Earlier predictions remain unchanged by parameter isolation, whereas unrestricted fine-tuning degrades them by factors of 14-29. Crucially, preservation alone does not establish reuse: norm-matched randomized-library controls show that the contribution of pretrained computation is conditional on the task and data regime. A separate decomposition shows that full-field relative L2 error can substantially understate error relative to spatial variation when field level dominates the norm. Task-specific operators remain more accurate on three of the five problems. These results distinguish multi-task coverage, preservation and pretrained reuse as separate properties that must be tested independently when scientific foundation models span heterogeneous interfaces.
Abstract:Scientific foundation models are commonly evaluated after heterogeneous physical problems have already been translated into a compatible gridded, tokenized or symbolic representation. This leaves the scientific interface outside both the pretrained model and the audit of what is actually reused. We study the complementary setting in which boundary histories, sparse monitor records and loading histories retain their native inference classes and their outputs remain on Cartesian, latitude-longitude and unstructured domains. GEODE couples task-specific scientific interfaces to a shared routed library of wavelet operators. A single jointly pretrained model represents cavity flow, radiation dose and elastoplastic stress, then acquires a heat exchanger and a reactor subchannel by training a private interface containing 2.1% of its parameters. Earlier predictions remain unchanged by parameter isolation, whereas unrestricted fine-tuning degrades them by factors of 14-29. Crucially, preservation alone does not establish reuse: norm-matched randomized-library controls show that the contribution of pretrained computation is conditional on the task and data regime. A separate decomposition shows that full-field relative L2 error can substantially understate error relative to spatial variation when field level dominates the norm. Task-specific operators remain more accurate on three of the five problems. These results distinguish multi-task coverage, preservation and pretrained reuse as separate properties that must be tested independently when scientific foundation models span heterogeneous interfaces.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computational Physics (physics.comp-ph)
arXiv:2609.38067 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.38067v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38067 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 311 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Problems of Proliferation
LessWrong · 29 sept. 2026
Does preservation make sense before we know how to revive?
LessWrong · 15 iun. 2026

Aurora 1.5: Extending open foundation models for weather and Earth-system applications
Microsoft Research · 9 iul. 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · 7 iun. 2026