analiza aiqbench
This research establishes fundamental information-theoretic limits on how much meaning can be extracted from text alone, proving that even advanced LLM hidden states cannot overcome intrinsic ambiguities without extralinguistic context. The study provides a rigorous theoretical framework for understanding the boundaries of current and future language models, demonstrating that certain semantic gaps are irreducible regardless of model scale or training data volume.
A Formal Limitation on Learning Human Language From Textual Corpora
arXiv:2608.28560v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Can a listener recover what a speaker means from the form of an utterance alone? We answer this question information-theoretically, and for a listener given by any featurizer of text, including the hidden states of contemporary large language models. Modeling language use as a joint distribution over meanings, contexts, and utterances, we derive upper bounds on the probability that a decoder recovers a speaker's intended meaning from a representation of the utterance. The bounds are governed by the uncertainty that form leaves about meaning, which splits into an irreducible part and a part that only (extralinguistic) context, but never the utterance alone, can resolve. Because these quantities are intrinsic to language, no representation, however much text or supervision produced it, can surpass them; the bounds hold whether the space of meanings is discrete or continuous. Experiments on artificial languages, Mandarin zero-pronoun resolution, and color reference provide empirical evidence in support of the theory.
Abstract:Can a listener recover what a speaker means from the form of an utterance alone? We answer this question information-theoretically, and for a listener given by any featurizer of text, including the hidden states of contemporary large language models. Modeling language use as a joint distribution over meanings, contexts, and utterances, we derive upper bounds on the probability that a decoder recovers a speaker's intended meaning from a representation of the utterance. The bounds are governed by the uncertainty that form leaves about meaning, which splits into an irreducible part and a part that only (extralinguistic) context, but never the utterance alone, can resolve. Because these quantities are intrinsic to language, no representation, however much text or supervision produced it, can surpass them; the bounds hold whether the space of meanings is discrete or continuous. Experiments on artificial languages, Mandarin zero-pronoun resolution, and color reference provide empirical evidence in support of the theory.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2608.28560 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.28560v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.28560 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 248 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] OpenAI reports Navier-Stokes singularity find in 88 hours using Astra-next, roughly 10,000 agents and 130B tokens (>$40M), a contender for second ever Millennium Prize awarded
Latent Space · 9 sept. 2026
How robust are natural language autoencoders to initialization?
AI Alignment Forum · 10 iul. 2026
NL2AGBench: Benchmarking LLM Auto-Formalization for AlphaGeometry
arXiv · 1 sept. 2026
Traceable LLM Reasoning for Fake-Order Fraud Detection
arXiv · 28 iul. 2026