analiza aiqbench
This paper provides rigorous finite-sample convergence guarantees for synchronous quantile temporal-difference learning in distributional reinforcement learning, distinguishing between local stochastic fluctuations and global sample complexity. By leveraging the order monotonicity of cumulative distribution functions and analyzing the Jacobian as a nonsingular M-matrix, the authors demonstrate that last-iterate fluctuations do not exhibit polynomial dependence on the number of quantiles. The work advances theoretical foundations for understanding stability mechanisms in advanced reinforcement learning algorithms without relying on asymptotic approximations.
A Finite Sample Analysis for Quantile Temporal Difference Learning in Distributional Reinforcement Learning
arXiv:2608.27313v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We establish a global finite-sample guarantee for synchronous quantile temporal-difference learning (QTD) in tabular distributional reinforcement learning. The proof separates two stability mechanisms. A global comparison argument, based on the order monotonicity of reward cumulative distribution functions and the $W_\infty$ contraction of the distributional Bellman operator, brings an arbitrarily initialized iterate into a local neighborhood. Inside that neighborhood, we linearize the QTD mean field. Its Jacobian is a nonsingular $M$-matrix, and the associated positive semigroup permits a variance-sensitive martingale analysis. For stepsizes $\alpha_t=c(t+1)^{-a}$ with $a\in(1/2,1)$, the leading last-iterate fluctuation is of order $\widetilde O\bigl(T^{-a/2}/\sqrt{1-\gamma}\bigr)$ and has no polynomial dependence on the number of quantiles. The deterministic transient and the required burn-in can still depend on the smallest Bellman-target density, which is of order $m^{-1}$ in the worst case. The result therefore distinguishes sharply between the local stochastic fluctuation and the global sample complexity.
Abstract:We establish a global finite-sample guarantee for synchronous quantile temporal-difference learning (QTD) in tabular distributional reinforcement learning. The proof separates two stability mechanisms. A global comparison argument, based on the order monotonicity of reward cumulative distribution functions and the $W_\infty$ contraction of the distributional Bellman operator, brings an arbitrarily initialized iterate into a local neighborhood. Inside that neighborhood, we linearize the QTD mean field. Its Jacobian is a nonsingular $M$-matrix, and the associated positive semigroup permits a variance-sensitive martingale analysis. For stepsizes $\alpha_t=c(t+1)^{-a}$ with $a\in(1/2,1)$, the leading last-iterate fluctuation is of order $\widetilde O\bigl(T^{-a/2}/\sqrt{1-\gamma}\bigr)$ and has no polynomial dependence on the number of quantiles. The deterministic transient and the required burn-in can still depend on the smallest Bellman-target density, which is of order $m^{-1}$ in the worst case. The result therefore distinguishes sharply between the local stochastic fluctuation and the global sample complexity.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.27313 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2608.27313v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.27313 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 240 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
A Finite-Iteration Theory for Asynchronous Categorical Distributional Temporal-Difference Learning
arXiv · 20 aug. 2026
Non-Crossing Deep Quantile Regression for Distributional Survival Prediction
arXiv · 19 aug. 2026
Fast Regularized Policy Mirror Descent with One-Step TD Updates
arXiv · 1 oct. 2026

Generalization and infinite width
LessWrong · 1 aug. 2026