analiza aiqbench
This paper formalizes dataset condensation through a discrepancy-based framework, unifying existing methods and extending their scope beyond generalization to include robustness and privacy constraints. By treating synthetic data generation as a rigorous distribution approximation problem, the work offers a more generalized definition for reducing training set sizes without sacrificing model performance.
A Discrepancy-Based Perspective on Dataset Condensation
arXiv:2509.10367v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Given a dataset of finitely many elements $\mathcal{T} = \{\mathbf{x}_i\}_{i = 1}^N$, the goal of dataset condensation (DC) is to construct a synthetic dataset $\mathcal{S} = \{\tilde{\mathbf{x}}_j\}_{j = 1}^M$ which is significantly smaller ($M \ll N$) such that a model trained from scratch on $\mathcal{S}$ achieves comparable or even superior generalization performance to a model trained on $\mathcal{T}$. Recent advances in DC reveal a close connection to the problem of approximating the data distribution represented by $\mathcal{T}$ with a reduced set of points. In this work, we present a unified framework that encompasses existing DC methods and extend the task-specific notion of DC to a more general and formal definition using notions of discrepancy, which quantify the distance between probability distribution in different regimes. Our framework broadens the objective of DC beyond generalization, accommodating additional objectives such as robustness, privacy, and other desirable properties.
Abstract:Given a dataset of finitely many elements $\mathcal{T} = \{\mathbf{x}_i\}_{i = 1}^N$, the goal of dataset condensation (DC) is to construct a synthetic dataset $\mathcal{S} = \{\tilde{\mathbf{x}}_j\}_{j = 1}^M$ which is significantly smaller ($M \ll N$) such that a model trained from scratch on $\mathcal{S}$ achieves comparable or even superior generalization performance to a model trained on $\mathcal{T}$. Recent advances in DC reveal a close connection to the problem of approximating the data distribution represented by $\mathcal{T}$ with a reduced set of points. In this work, we present a unified framework that encompasses existing DC methods and extend the task-specific notion of DC to a more general and formal definition using notions of discrepancy, which quantify the distance between probability distribution in different regimes. Our framework broadens the objective of DC beyond generalization, accommodating additional objectives such as robustness, privacy, and other desirable properties.
42 pages, 5 tables, 3 figures. Accepted at TMLR
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2509.10367 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2509.10367v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.10367 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 245 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · 6 aug. 2026

Quantum Circuits Cut Data Imbalance Recall Gap by 10–25%
Quantum Zeitgeist · 13 iul. 2026
Contextual Distributionally Robust Optimization with Causal and Continuous Structure
arXiv · 30 sept. 2026
CauseCollab: Causal Unified and Modality-Agnostic Network for Heterogeneous Collaborative Perception
arXiv · 5 sept. 2026