analiza aiqbench
This research introduces a training-free, differentiable optimization framework that jointly refines 3D bounding box registration and temporal smoothness for LiDAR point cloud streams. By integrating these objectives into a single L-BFGS solver rather than using separate post-hoc filters, the method significantly reduces trajectory roughness for well-observed tracks without sacrificing geometric accuracy. However, performance degrades near edge-on viewing angles where orientation alignment becomes unreliable due to noisy velocity estimates, highlighting specific limits of this approach in sparse visibility scenarios.
A Differentiable Optimization Framework for Registering Sequential Bounding Boxes with Point Cloud Stream
arXiv:2609.34103v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Refining a sequence of coarse 3D bounding boxes against a LiDAR point-cloud stream demands tracks that are geometrically accurate (high IoU) and temporally coherent (low roughness), preferably without training data. The usual recipe keeps the two concerns apart: register each frame independently, then smooth the trajectory afterwards with a Kalman~RTS or Savitzky--Golay filter. Smoothing displaces boxes from a geometric optimum and never re-optimises, so it trades accuracy for smoothness. We instead fold the temporal smoothness constraint into a training-free registration objective and solve for all poses jointly with L-BFGS. The payoff depends on how well the object is seen. On well-observed tracks it is large: within the low-roughness budget, the joint objective beats both post-hoc smoothers on paired multi-seed statistics and cuts roughness several-fold relative to frame-wise registration at matched accuracy. Treating visibility as an experimental variable exposes the limit. The advantage decays monotonically as views become one-sided, until it is indistinguishable from zero for near-edge-on objects and slightly negative under a ray-cast simulator with range-dependent density and ego motion, where the decoupled pipeline is in fact ahead at tight roughness budgets. We locate that boundary and trace it to one term: orientation alignment ties yaw to the estimated velocity and fails once that estimate is noisy. A ground-truth-free rule can choose the temporal scale and keep every track inside the roughness budget.
Abstract:Refining a sequence of coarse 3D bounding boxes against a LiDAR point-cloud stream demands tracks that are geometrically accurate (high IoU) and temporally coherent (low roughness), preferably without training data. The usual recipe keeps the two concerns apart: register each frame independently, then smooth the trajectory afterwards with a Kalman~RTS or Savitzky--Golay filter. Smoothing displaces boxes from a geometric optimum and never re-optimises, so it trades accuracy for smoothness. We instead fold the temporal smoothness constraint into a training-free registration objective and solve for all poses jointly with L-BFGS. The payoff depends on how well the object is seen. On well-observed tracks it is large: within the low-roughness budget, the joint objective beats both post-hoc smoothers on paired multi-seed statistics and cuts roughness several-fold relative to frame-wise registration at matched accuracy. Treating visibility as an experimental variable exposes the limit. The advantage decays monotonically as views become one-sided, until it is indistinguishable from zero for near-edge-on objects and slightly negative under a ray-cast simulator with range-dependent density and ego motion, where the decoupled pipeline is in fact ahead at tight roughness budgets. We locate that boundary and trace it to one term: orientation alignment ties yaw to the estimated velocity and fails once that estimate is noisy. A ground-truth-free rule can choose the temporal scale and keep every track inside the roughness budget.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.34103 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.34103v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.34103 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 317 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · 17 oct. 2026

Universal Dilation of Linear Itô SDEs: Quantum Trajectories and Lindblad Simulation of Second Moments
Quantum Journal · 1 oct. 2026
ISBO: Scalable Spatio-Temporal Bayesian Optimization with Log Gaussian Cox Process Models via the INLA-SPDE Approach
arXiv · 9 oct. 2026
Structured Variational Key Concentration for a Reduced AES Cipher
arXiv · 24 sept. 2026