analiza aiqbench
This research proposes a compositional kernel ridge regression framework that effectively eliminates noise variables during feature learning, particularly when inputs follow Gaussian distributions. A key theoretical contribution demonstrates that $\ell_1$-type kernels like the Laplace kernel can recover nonlinear features at stationary points, whereas standard Gaussian kernels are limited to linear recovery. This work advances the mathematical understanding of variable selection and feature representation within compositional architectures.
A Compositional Kernel Model for Feature Learning
arXiv:2509.14158v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study a compositional variant of kernel ridge regression in which the predictor is applied to a coordinate-wise reweighting of the inputs. Formulated as a variational problem, this model provides a tractable setting for studying feature learning in compositional architectures. From the perspective of variable selection, we show how relevant variables are recovered while noise variables are eliminated. We prove that both global minimizers and stationary points discard noise coordinates when the noise variables are Gaussian distributed. A central finding is that $\ell_1$-type kernels, such as the Laplace kernel, succeed in recovering features contributing to nonlinear effects at stationary points, whereas Gaussian kernels recover only linear ones.
Abstract:We study a compositional variant of kernel ridge regression in which the predictor is applied to a coordinate-wise reweighting of the inputs. Formulated as a variational problem, this model provides a tractable setting for studying feature learning in compositional architectures. From the perspective of variable selection, we show how relevant variables are recovered while noise variables are eliminated. We prove that both global minimizers and stationary points discard noise coordinates when the noise variables are Gaussian distributed. A central finding is that $\ell_1$-type kernels, such as the Laplace kernel, succeed in recovering features contributing to nonlinear effects at stationary points, whereas Gaussian kernels recover only linear ones.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2509.14158 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2509.14158v3 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.14158 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 203 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Academia is for Ambition — Alex Zhang, MIT
Latent Space · 2 oct. 2026

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · 27 iul. 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026

Introducing PIRAMID: Physics-Informed Research for Ambitious Mechanistic Interpretability
LessWrong · 25 iul. 2026