analiza aiqbench
This paper proposes the Bayesian Mirror Architecture (BMA), a theoretical framework where consciousness emerges from circular recursion between sensory abstractions and self-representations rather than being an explicit optimization goal. By modeling inference over probability measures with optimal-transport geometry, it defines specific regimes for causal learning and stability without requiring global contractivity. The work remains firmly in the realm of architectural theory for generative systems, offering a mathematical formalization for how self-modeling might arise in advanced AI.
A Bayesian Mirror Architecture for Emergent Consciousness: Circular Hierarchies, Self-Manifolds, and Hybrid Event-Self Binding
arXiv:2610.08792v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present a foundational formulation of the Bayesian Mirror Architecture (BMA), a self-referential generative framework in which sensory abstractions, meta-abstractions, and a self-latent interact through circular recursion. The defining constraint is a closed update S_t <- H_{t-1}, where a hybrid event-self latent H_t binds self-representations to abstract world models and reinjects this coupling into the self-state. Consciousness, in a restricted sense, is not an optimization objective nor a semantic label, but an architectural property of systems possessing this circular structure. Because inference operates over posterior beliefs, BMA's intrinsic state space is a space of probability measures equipped with optimal-transport geometry. Stability and coherence are formulated in the 2-Wasserstein metric on P_2, yielding coordinate-free notions of self-stability and hybrid coherence along belief trajectories. We define a Causal Learning Regime (CLR) via bounds on Wasserstein belief drift together with an integration index capturing sustained coupling between self and world latents. CLR diagnoses whether the environment contains learnable causal structure; it is not a marker of consciousness. Global strict contractivity is not required: BMA may exhibit multiple coherent basins. We define self-manifolds basin-wise as supports of invariant measures under local Wasserstein contractivity. We identify Wasserstein epsilon-necks, transport bottlenecks where basins decouple, yielding a unique realized continuation in a vanishing-conductance limit. We interpret this selection as choice: internally determined yet externally unpredictable at finite resolution. Learning proceeds via variational free-energy minimization, with stability and agency emerging from what the environment affords to learn.
Abstract:We present a foundational formulation of the Bayesian Mirror Architecture (BMA), a self-referential generative framework in which sensory abstractions, meta-abstractions, and a self-latent interact through circular recursion. The defining constraint is a closed update S_t <- H_{t-1}, where a hybrid event-self latent H_t binds self-representations to abstract world models and reinjects this coupling into the self-state. Consciousness, in a restricted sense, is not an optimization objective nor a semantic label, but an architectural property of systems possessing this circular structure. Because inference operates over posterior beliefs, BMA's intrinsic state space is a space of probability measures equipped with optimal-transport geometry. Stability and coherence are formulated in the 2-Wasserstein metric on P_2, yielding coordinate-free notions of self-stability and hybrid coherence along belief trajectories. We define a Causal Learning Regime (CLR) via bounds on Wasserstein belief drift together with an integration index capturing sustained coupling between self and world latents. CLR diagnoses whether the environment contains learnable causal structure; it is not a marker of consciousness. Global strict contractivity is not required: BMA may exhibit multiple coherent basins. We define self-manifolds basin-wise as supports of invariant measures under local Wasserstein contractivity. We identify Wasserstein epsilon-necks, transport bottlenecks where basins decouple, yielding a unique realized continuation in a vanishing-conductance limit. We interpret this selection as choice: internally determined yet externally unpredictable at finite resolution. Learning proceeds via variational free-energy minimization, with stability and agency emerging from what the environment affords to learn.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.08792 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.08792v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.08792 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 331 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · 12 iun. 2026

Import AI 470: No rights for machines; automating environment generation with SPADE; and building better GPU kernels with Hawkeye
Import AI · 24 aug. 2026

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · 27 iul. 2026